OPINION
Joyce Kamen
Joyce Kamen is the VP of public information at the Frontline Covid19 Critical Care Alliance (flccc.net). She is an Emmy award-winning writer, publicist, journalist, columnist, and producer of documentary films.
(REPOSTED FROM THE FLCCC WEEKLY NEWS CAPSULE)
In a head-spinning interview in Nature with Kathrin Jansen, the recently retired head of vaccine R&D at Pfizer, we read in horror as she said this:
“We got creative — we couldn’t wait for data, we had to do so much ‘at risk’. We flew the aeroplane while we were still building it.”
Wait, WHAT? Does that sound safe to you? Flying an airplane while it’s still being built? That doesn’t sound safe to us at all.
And they “couldn’t wait for data?”
Dear, dear reader, if you read nothing more in this News Capsule today, please, in the name of humanity, read the following:
At the start of the pandemic, the highly published and world renowned physician/scholars of the FLCCC’s Critical Care team, under the brilliant leadership of Dr. Paul Marik, developed a protocol that was saving the lives of critically ill patients in the hospitals where it was being used. Our protocol achieved a 4-6% mortality rate. Hospitals NOT using the protocol had a 23%-80% mortality rate. But the FLCCC was dismissed, censored and shunned by mainstream medicine and major media because they insisted that we provide them with the DATA that proved our protocol’s safety and efficacy.
No data? Well, then no saving the lives of people who we KNEW were dying unnecessarily. Our doctors used their deep knowledge of how the therapeutics worked, their clinical experience and sheer brilliance to allow their patients to walk out of the hospital and into the grateful arms of their families. Meanwhile other hospitals threw up their hands, waited for data, and chose instead to summon box trucks to haul away the dead through the back doors.
And then there was this from Kathrin Jansen:
“[In March 2020] when our CEO said, “Get it done before the end of the year,” I said, “This is crazy!” But money was not an issue — and, then, you can do amazing things in an amazing amount of time.”
Wait, WHAT? You mean just by throwing money at science, you can make it dance, sing and perform heretofore impossible scientific miracles for you? Like suddenly science can do a time hop over the months and years it has always taken to develop safe and effective vaccines? Wow. Gotta say we didn’t know that. Groovy man, groovy.
And get this:
“Another reason the mRNA platform came out as the front-runner was that we think you can boost as much and as long as you want and not get immune responses to the vector itself — the mRNA.”
Wait, WHAT? You mean you KNEW that efficacy was going to quickly wane requiring booster after booster to protect people? Did you know enough about mRNA vaccines and their safety to support an endless flurry of boosters so definitively? So what’s it gonna be? A booster once a month? A week? Daily? Morning and night? There’s a lotta lettuce in those boo$ter$, right?
Whoa.
Here’s what she said next:
“But the mRNA platform wasn’t ready for prime time. There were stability issues, formulation issues, that we needed to solve. In 2020, it was only a research process and it needed to be scaled up.
Usually, you start with a small reactor, and then you go to bigger and bigger reactors. We didn’t have time to do this. Instead, we just cloned this relatively small-scale research process many times and over multiple sites to get to the capacity to produce billions of doses.”
Wait, WHAT? The mRNA vaccines were NOT ready for prime time? Stability issues? Formulation issues? It was only a research process? Not even in the testing phase? And STILL you produced billions of doses using small scale research (your words) while rolling the dice on billions of lives?
Readers, you get it.
What we don’t get is why Nature ran this article as some kind of victory lap for Pfizer and Ms. Jansen when people lost their lives or sustained serious injuries because Pfizer/BioNTech flew an unfinished airplane.
That they are now joyfully bragging about it, and somehow managed to convince Nature to fly with them too, is well beyond our comprehension.
There WAS a way to save people from dying that was cheap, globally available, super-safe and highly effective. But there was more money to be made in trotting out unfinished, unstable, barely tested, next-gen airplanes than there was in putting the key in the ignition of the most reliable car you’ve ever owned.
Read the whole story here. Your thoughts?