OPINION
Dr Guy David Hatchard
Guy is an international advocate of food safety and natural medicine. He received his undergraduate degree in Logic and Theoretical Physics from the University of Sussex and his Ph.D. in Psychology from Maharishi University of Management, Fairfield Iowa. He was formerly a senior manager at Genetic ID, a global food safety testing and certification laboratory. His published work uses the statistical methods of the physical sciences to analyse social data.
The UK Daily Mail led yesterday with a story about the heart attack suffered by Bronny James on the basketball court. According to two UK doctors described as leading experts and cited by the Mail, the suggestion that this might be the result of a vaccine injury is a conspiracy theory.
The article concedes that deaths from heart disease are at record levels and also concedes that Covid vaccines cause heart damage, but stiffly maintains that those conflating these two facts are not only in error but are also engaged in a conspiracy to pervert truth and presumably justice. The BBC also chimes in with an article claiming piously, “there is no evidence to support the implication vaccines might be involved”.
At the ‘heart’ of these claims is the suggestion that vaccine-induced myocarditis is rare, so rare that it could not possibly be causing the huge rate of excess deaths from heart disease which amounts, according to the British Heart Foundation, to a massive 30,000 extra UK deaths per year when compared to pre-pandemic levels.
At the same time as Bronny James was suffering a tragic heart attack and its aftermath, Swiss scientists finalised a scientific paper for publication entitled “Sex specific differences in myocardial injury incidence after Covid-19 mRNA-1273 booster vaccination”. This is a landmark study because it is a gold standard, carefully-planned, prospective study with a rigorous schedule of tests rather than an incomplete retrospective assessment of past events.
777 health care workers were tested for myocardial damage three days after booster vaccination and compared to the same number of controls. 40 of them (1 in 20) had elevated troponin levels indicative of damage to cardiac cells. These people (65 per cent of them women) were subject to follow up tests and 22 of them (1 in 35) were judged to have vaccine-induced myocardial injury. This careful study proves that myocardial injury has been massively underreported. The Mail reports that the UK Government’s Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) had previously estimated a rate of just one in 666. Now known to be wrong by a factor of 20.
By no stretch of the imagination can myocardial injury be judged to be ‘extremely rare’ as the Mail suggests. Nor, according to this detailed discussion by Dr John Campbell, is this level of risk something any of us would consider taking on unless we faced imminent death as an alternative, which we don’t. For another discussion see this informative Substack article.
Fortunately, the short-term effects among those tested in the Swiss study did not include severe outcomes, but another prospective study completed in 2022 in Thailand on 314 high school students did find such severe effects. It is well known that myocarditis has both short-term and long-term outcomes. The elevated rate of excess deaths from heart disease in the general population does point to the need to ask questions. Asking them publicly does not amount to a conspiracy. The dismissal of these claims suggests there is an attempt to cover up on the part of the same doctors who coerced us to take the jabs and told us they were effective and safe (they aren’t).
Other causal factors for the steep rise in excess deaths from heart disease suggested by the Mail include the rise in ambulance response times to cardiac incidents from 30 to 90 minutes. It is surely not too hard for the newspaper to realise that if there are more cardiac events there will be longer response times, not the other way around. Another suggestion widely touted until recently was a supposed failure to prescribe statins during the pandemic, this disappeared from newsprint pages when it was realised that statin prescriptions have actually not decreased.
If you want to know just how convoluted denial of responsibility can become, read a translation of an article from Sweden where a 30-year-old man died after receiving a booster jab. The government paid his family financial compensation but listed the event as the result of a medicine given in error rather than suffer the embarrassment of calling it a vaccine-related death. A paper analysing autopsy results following Covid vaccination underlines the intended obfuscation of this kind of doublespeak.
Behind this posturing and denial of responsibility lies something much darker with more chilling implications for public health. It is not just heart attacks that are up to levels never seen before. Ditto for cancers, kidney injury, neurological injury, strokes, miscarriages, menstrual irregularities, stillbirths, cognitive decline and, crucially, unexplained deaths.
These statistics point to the need for probing questions of a different type. Are the vaccines or indeed Covid infection, which the balance of evidence now suggests both came from a biotech lab, causing generalised immune instability and, more worryingly, how long is this going to go on, and how bad will it get?
Sometimes you find that you have to face up to extreme challenges in your personal life. Our responses to these crises define who we are and what we can become. This can require admitting to ourselves and others that we got it all wrong. Apology and humility build character and support honesty.
Crises can also engulf the whole of society. The casual dismissal of questions about vaccine safety shows we have arrived at just such a societal crisis. A crisis of health and truth whose dimensions appear to dwarf anything civilisation as a whole has had to face in our lifetimes. The beginnings of this crisis are no doubt lost in history, but the turning point came when some decision-makers in the pharmaceutical industry at the start of the pandemic decided it would be safe to unleash biotechnology on the general public. We are just at the beginning of this era. The WHO 2030 Agenda predicts that we will all be subject to hundreds of novel vaccines within the decade.
Biotechnology medicine was well known to be unsafe and inherently mutagenic pre-pandemic. Crucially it wasn’t so much what we knew, but what we didn’t know, that constituted the colossal error of judgement, hubris, cruelty and greed. A single cell, the origin of life, contains an uncountable 100 trillion atoms organised into 42 million protein molecules and 20,000 genes. Scientists have only a vague picture of how cells work. They have no idea how cells produce consciousness [or] how cells join together (37.2 trillion of them) to form a single human identity with amazing autonomic functions and immunity.
What we thought they knew can only be described as a crude notion put together from a few isolated facts derived from a countable number of experiments. Scientists don’t understand how intra-cellular transport and selection are managed. They only have a hazy comprehension of the role of electric fields, molecular shape, vibrational modes, so-called dark areas of our genome and multi-gene cooperative functions.
What we do know for certain is the immense precision involved and the vulnerability to even very small edits to their structure. Cells work very hard to protect this precision, each one completes over 70,000 self-repairs every day. With this in mind, it becomes very apparent that those working in the field of gene therapy knew from previous failures and disasters just how potentially dangerous Covid vaccines could be. Some did warn their superiors, who not only ignored them but set about telling the general public that biotechnology was completely safe and near 100 per cent infallible. This was a big lie, not to say the crime of the century.
As you no doubt know very well, once you have told one lie, it is very hard to avoid telling more lies, which can eventually become a world of untruth that eats away at your conscience and peace. This has become the fate of society during the pandemic. No one is participating more enthusiastically than the fourth estate. Every day, newspapers print articles claiming that excess deaths, which are running into millions worldwide, are normal or non-existent and have nothing to do with the obvious culprit. Governments are looking the other way and piously washing their hands of the matter like Pontius Pilate, while medical authorities are busying themselves hiding the data and refusing to carry out tests and autopsies.
The new generation of biotech medicines is squarely aimed at editing the internal operation of cells, the control system that keeps our physiology and our life flying safely along. It shouldn’t be a surprise to learn that handicapping the pilot might crash the plane. The only surprise is that millions of crashed planes worldwide are being ignored. We are living in a very different world from the one we thought we inhabited. I hope we are not so daft that we stop asking questions on the advice of those manifestly profiting from the pandemic.
After reporting earlier that there have been 100,000 extra UK deaths from heart disease alone, the Mail concludes by claiming without evidence that the number of vaccine-related deaths pales in comparison to the estimated 230,000 deaths that Covid inoculation has supposedly saved (???) – a figure widely disputed and believed to be wildly inflated. Even so two to five are not odds that I would accept if I had to put my life up as collateral, would you?
Articles like those today in the Daily Mail and the BBC, and there are many of them published every day, are not just bad journalism, they are part of an insidious push to promote drugs that are known to harm people. They are intended to quiet the concern of people worldwide who are waking up to their tragic side effects and complete ineffectiveness. The purpose is manifestly the inflation of the profits of a trillion-dollar industry that has proved itself callous and criminal, unfit to dominate public health policy as they do through revolving doors between regulators and industry insiders and through obscene advertising expenditure and gifts to medical professionals.