Ho-hum, another climate beano, another avalance of lies and spin. But we all knew that, even before a single private jet had taken off, Egypt-bound.
The scam is so obvious that even an ignorant loon like Greta Thunberg can see it. Sadly, your average legacy media is even more nutty and ignorant than a retarded Swedish teenager.
It should be obvious to all but the most naive catastrophist journalists that national leaders, presiding over a 6 per cent rise in global emissions this past year, don’t actually believe in an imminent emergency. Nor will many national leaders fall for the reparations line that is being repackaged as “loss and damage” payments at this year’s COP27 in Sharm el-Sheikh, Egypt.
When even the most whipped green cuck is tacitly admitting that it’s all about the gibsmedat, the jig is well and truly up.
Even former Tory PM Boris Johnson, who risked his prime ministership and his country’s economic security in the name of climate action, has said the UK does not have the financial resources to pay reparations to low-income countries affected by climate change, according to a report in the London Financial Times on November 7.
But why should the UK pay, anyway? The narrative, of course, is that “rich western countries did the damage”. But is this even true?
The Daily Telegraph in London the same day reported: “China has emitted more carbon dioxide over the past eight years than the UK has since the start of the industrial revolution. Between 1750 and 2020 the UK emitted 78 billion tonnes of carbon dioxide … compared with China’s emissions of 80 billion tonnes since 2013.”
Let that sink in:
“Developing” China has emitted more CO2 in less than a decade than Britain has since the Industrial Revolution.
With less than 1% of global emissions, Australia’s contribution to alleged global warming throughout its entire history would barely amount to a single Chinese city in the last decade alone.
While Australia will most likely pay climate bribes to Pacific Islands, the public will eventually find out what the ABC Fact Check unit confirmed in December 2018: most island nations in the Pacific are growing rather than shrinking. Don’t expect ABC reporters to admit that or to challenge Pacific Island leaders complaining about CO2 but taking Chinese money when China is the biggest contributor to global emissions.
So, sorry Pacific grifters: you don’t deserve a cent from Australia. In fact, you can get in line when we claim climate reparations from China.
In the meanwhile, even the Climate Cult can’t keep bamboozling us forever that “renewables” are anything but a ruinously costly farce.
The general public is starting to understand fossil fuels are not being abandoned in most countries and the UN’s preferred power sources – wind and solar power – are not proving cheap or reliable.
Legacy media journalists, naturally, are a whole lot slower on the uptake.
RN Breakfast host Patricia Karvelas seemed surprised by the point former Energy Security Board chair Kerry Schott made during an on-air interview last Monday morning […]
Asked by Karvelas to comment on a warning the previous week by AGL chair Patricia McKenzie that closing all the company’s generators early would destroy the reliability of the electricity grid because replacement capacity cannot be built in time, Schott said: “Well I think it may not be possible but I think we’ve got to try.”
The Australian
Keep in mind that Schott is a fully paid-up member of the Climate Cult. Yes, the scam is becoming that obvious.
One day, even someone so dense as a legacy media journalist might catch on.
Well, here’s hoping…