‘Her’ Penis Made ‘Her’ Do It

Intersectionality is the gift that keeps on giving to the mendacious, deluded and just plain wicked. It seems you can get away with just about anything if you can tally up enough victim points. Just ask Jussy Smollett. Here in Australia, all manner of offenders have been excused or treated leniently for their crimes, on account of their “victim” status. For instance, an Afghan asylum seeker had his charges for attempting to abduct a small girl dismissed (his third child abuse offence), because of “cultural differences”.

Now it seems that all you have to do to walk on even the vilest crimes is to just put on a dress and whinge that you’re “oppressed”.

An Australian appeals court overturned a transgender woman’s conviction on child pornography charges because she he had been “struggling with issues concerning transgender identity.”

According to the Queensland Supreme Court’s Sept. 2 decision, Vetea Joseph Bunton, 22, was caught in January 2016 with images on her his phone of children engaged in sex acts with each other and with adults. She He was 18 years old at the time.

“There were a total of 15 images depicting young boys between the age of five years and 16 years posing naked, performing oral sex or engaging in anal intercourse, either with other young people or adults,” the court said.

The trial judge wasn’t buying the “But I’m a poor, confused tranny” excuse.

Justice Devereaux also noted Bunton’s youth, her his lack of a criminal record and the “small number of images” on her hisphone. But he found that none of these explanations “really excuses obtaining child exploitation material with children as young as five.”

Devereaux sentenced Bunton to two years’ probation and mandatory medical, psychiatric or psychological treatment. She He was required to register as a sex offender.

Well, that’s just “transphobic”, apparently.

However, in setting aside the lower court’s conviction last month, the appeals court unanimously deemed Bunton’s punishment “inappropriate” and “disproportionate to the real risk she he presents by her his offending.”

Writing for a three-judge panel, Justice Philip Morrison acknowledged that “possession of child exploitation material is not a victimless crime.” But, he said, “In my respectful view, the applicant’s circumstances are unusual.”

“Unusual” doesn’t begin to describe it. But it certainly doesn’t excuse it. Jeffrey Dahmer was “unusual”, too.

[…]the judge expressed concern that as a registered sex offender, Bunton would be subjected to “onerous” requirements to report her whereabouts to police for five years. In particular, he worried about her his ability to travel abroad and change her name after she he “undergoes transgender treatment.”

pluralist.com/vetea-joseph-bunton-child-porn-conviction-overturned

Well, cry me a river. It’s almost like punishment is meant to be onerous.

We’re already seeing tranny rapists get lenient treatment in the prison system by being set loose in women’s prisons where, surprise, surprise, they take advantage of the smorgasbord dished up to them, and rape again. “Transgender” laws are giving free passes to men to invade women’s private spaces. Now, tranny paedophiles are being allowed to go scot-free.

That’ll all work out well, I’m sure.