How Is This Not Grooming?

The groomer left has spent much of the last week professing outrage and indignation that parents have dared to complain about a “sex education” book that features graphic (literally) material on all manner of fetishes. Not to mention instructions on how to “safely” send nude photos.

A book, mind you, whose co-author encourages parents to buy for children as young as eight.

Time and again, we see this sleazy gambit from the groomer left: plying kids with plainly obscene material and then whining that it’s just “responsible sex education”. How dare anyone liken it to “grooming”.

Except that that’s exactly what it is. What do groomers do, after all? Expose children to increasingly sexualised material, in order to normalise it — all while trying to keep it secret from parents or guardians.

Michael Doherty, 50, from Suffolk, was shocked by what he saw when teachers at Thurston Primary School finally allowed him to see teaching materials intended for his nine-year-old daughter – after weeks of not allowing him access.

It follows MailOnline revealing a wealth of questionable and sometimes graphic teaching material made for controversial Relationships and Sex Education (RSE) classes, which became compulsory three years ago.

“Mates and Dates”, anyone?

As we’ve seen in the States, when parents try to read in public material that is supposedly OK for young children, school boards hurriedly shut off their microphones or hustle them from the podium. Because it’s “inappropriate”. Which begs the question: if it’s too obscene to read in a public meeting, why is it fine for a classroom of children?

Secretive lesson plans showed schoolchildren are being taught about anal sex and orgasms before they have reached puberty.

And there’s nothing parents can do about it if the bureaucratic groomers have their way.

When he asked to remove his daughter from the class on religious grounds, he was told he did not have the right to withdraw her ‘because it is important that all children receive this content, covering topics such as friendships and how to stay safe’.

In tandem with the bullying is an obsession with secrecy and lies.

The school told him they had consulted parents. Yet documents seen by MailOnline reveal the primary school used the Covid pandemic as a reason they could not share specific teacher material with parents.

A letter sent to Mr Doherty by the headteacher also claimed the school followed the national curriculum for PSHE relationships – however no such national curriculum exists.

Mr Doherty told MailOnline: ‘It’s cutting parents out of the loop. You should be consulting with parents. They just refused to do it.

‘I feel as a parent they were quite hostile to me. You’re treated like some sort of prude. But I think you need to speak up.’

He objected to his daughter being shown a BBC Bitesize video showing a boy having a wet dream, getting an erection and ejaculating.

After Mr Doherty complained to the BBC, the video was removed from their website.

Why did they remove the video, if there was nothing wrong with it? It’s almost as if the only wrong thing was that they were caught out.

The standard response here is that “oh, children are already exposed to porn on the internet”. Which makes as much sense as arguing that, hey, children can buy drugs on the street: why don’t we hand them drugs ourselves? It’ll be safer!

Schools’ priorities are also questionable: they’ll force kids to watch wet dream videos, but teaching them to actually read or write? Forget it.

He said: ‘Children are coming out of schools illiterate and they are doing this stuff. As a parent it just feels wrong. The video is really strange and disgusting. It’s a really creepy and vile video’ […]

Sophia is now spending the rest of the school year with family in Poland before Mr Doherty and his wife plan to find another primary school in September.

If they can’t find one, they are prepared to homeschool her.

Daily Mail

Frankly, it’s fast becoming the only sane recourse.