There’s something very obvious about the “trans” movement: its violent, creepy, maleness. Gay men have long been notoriously misogynistic: trannies take the disdain for women inherent in so much “queer” culture to a whole new, violent, level. If you want to beat them, join them, it seems.
Notwithstanding the fad-driven recent spike in female-to-male transgenderism, it remains obvious that transgender ideology is predominantly driven by men. And what nasty, woman-hating men they are. From prancing about as the most garishly offensive caricatures of women imaginable, like so many wannabe Ed Geins dressing up in the flayed skins of his victims, to the howling lynch mobs who scream, spit, punch and kick, with virtual impugnity, women who dare assert their sex-based rights.
But if women are copping it hard from the “Queer” movement, girls are getting it even worse. Few things make that more brutally obvious than the gay male baby-surrogacy industry. Not only do these rich, Western men get to exploit almost invariably poor women in developing countries as just walking incubators, but there’s also something very noticeable about their baby preferences.
I was interested to see that a gay male couple are suing a Californian fertility clinic after they ordered a son but were served a daughter.
Pink News huffed this month:
Albert and Anthony Saniger were determined to be fathers to two sons. Before the couple wed in 2013 they had already chosen the names of their future kids and even created Gmail accounts for them. The HRC Fertility clinic and fertility specialist Dr Bradford A Kolb reportedly assured the couple that they could make this happen. The couple were explicitly clear that they wanted a male embryo implanted in their surrogate. The couple is seeking unspecified damages, citing the $300,000 cost of the fertility process, as well as the cost of raising three children instead of two, as they still plan to have two sons […]
This got me thinking – when gay men choose surrogacy, do they often specify the sex of the baby?
It would appear to be the case.
There’s the grandaddy of them all, Elton John, who quipped recently that his surrogated sons were ‘co-fathering’ a male dog. There was a poignant photo in 2018 of John, David Furnish, the actor Neil Patrick Harris and his fiance David Burtka, each couple with two surrogate children apiece; just one of them was a little girl and how odd-one-out she looked in this world of men.
Spectator Australia
Now we learn that medical researchers are investigating the possibility of transplanting uteruses. How liberating for the Queer New World, should they no longer have to put up with bothersome women, even as sentient incubators?
Even before they get to erase women from the quintessentially female act of bearing children, some transgenders are jumping the queue and usurping that other essential female role: breastfeeding.
Left-wing activist Mika Minio-Paluello, who identifies as trans […] included a photo of him with a baby suckling at his nipple. ‘Trans women can breastfeed, and I did breastfeed my child’, he claimed.
Apparently everything must now come second to gender ideology, including standard medical advice about feeding babies. When women breastfeed their infants, they are told to avoid everything from paracetamol to a glass of wine. Yet to induce simulated lactation in men requires a cocktail of powerful drugs, the effects of which on babies are unknown. Discharge from men’s nipples is also usually a sign of sickness […]
This attempt to sever the relationship between mother and child shows us that nothing is out of bounds to trans activists. First, they rewrote language, claiming ‘she’ and ‘woman’ as their own. Then they colonised the spaces and services that women need to feel safe. Now they are attempting to remake motherhood in their own image. A man subjecting his child to questionable secretions from his nipples feels like the final insult.
Spiked Online
Considered in the light of all this, in fact, the recent and unusual spike in female-to-male “transgenders” (until just a few years ago, transgenderism was an almost exclusively male fetish) takes on a sinister new cast. Is this just one more way of erasing women: by sterilising and mutilating them from an early age into as grotesque parodies of men as trannies are of women?
Feminists spent the last couple of centuries trying to free women from male domination. Now, they’ve been gaslit into becoming nothing more than handmaids and brood mares again — only this time, at the behest of a gaggle of homosexuals and transvestites.