New Zealand Doctors Speaking Out with Science
In February 2024, CEO of the New Zealand Medical Council, and Chair of the International Association of Medical Regulatory Authorities (IAMRA) Joan Simeon signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with World Health Organization (WHO) Director-General, Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus. Although press releases about the MoU can be found on IAMRA, WHO and MCNZ websites, the actual document has not been shared with the public and is proving difficult to obtain.
The main points, according to all press releases, seem to be about a commitment to strengthening further the regulation of doctors, and protecting the public from undefined mis- and disinformation.
As Chief Executive of the Medical Council, Joan Simeon’s bio states:
Joan has a strong interest in using medical regulatory levers, alongside influence to improve professionalism, ensure competence and ultimately public safety. Joan is an advocate for equity in healthcare and sees the regulator as having a key role in achieving this.
It seems, given actions of the MCNZ over the past four years, Joan Simeon wants doctors to fall in line and ‘just follow orders’, rather than think independently about the individual patient in front of them.
The MCNZ under Joan Simeon is already well versed in using ‘medical regulatory levers’ by censoring, silencing, threatening and re-educating ethical doctors who are trying to uphold crumbling medical ethics. We are not sure that the influence of the MCNZ is improving professionalism as many people are now telling us they have no confidence in their doctors or the health system and want to avoid both at all costs. As for ‘ensuring public safety’, the MCNZ has dropped the ball on this one and allowed many New Zealanders to be harmed or killed by a novel gene technology that it insisted doctors themselves take and encouraged doctors to coerce their patients to take.
The man she teamed up with in February, to clamp down further on unruly doctors committed to medical ethics and free speech, is the very controversial Tedros Ghebreyesus, head of the private and unaccountable World Health Organization. He was a former leader of the Tigray People’s Liberation Front (TPLF), still officially named as a terrorist group.
Economist David Steinman, foreign adviser to Ethiopia’s democracy movement for 27 years until its 2018 victory, and former US National Security Council consultant, filed a complaint to the International Criminal Court (ICC) in The Hague in 2020, naming Tedros as a key player in an Ethiopian genocide. It is alleged that during his time as TPLF Foreign Minister, he played a crucial decision-making role in “killing, and causing serious bodily and mental harm to, members of the Amhara, Konso, Oromo and Somali tribes with intent to destroy those tribes in whole or in part”.
Tedros was selected for the top job at WHO by a Mr Gates and the Communist Party of China, both major funders. In 2021 Tedros was again named as a perpetrator of crimes against humanity and war crimes, this time against the people of the United Kingdom, in another complaint filed to the ICC. Whilst this complaint appears to have been assigned a reference number by the ICC, it is very difficult to find any updates on their response. Is it possible that this is influenced by the fact that Section 19 of the World Health Organization Constitution exempts Tedros from legal process?
Tedros has shown himself a dictator and willing to ride roughshod over his advisory committees, for instance in declaring Monkey Pox (MP) a pandemic, despite it being a minor problem for a select demographic. A potentially dangerous small pox vaccine waiting in the wings was then made widely available for those who could be convinced they were at risk.
Currently Tedros is busy scaring the world about his next pandemic of Disease X, and he worries that we may reject his plans for absolute control of member nations’ public health policies at his whim. The intended amendments to the infamous IHRs (International Health Regulations) will allow him to lock up and force-vaccinate the world on mere suspicion of a pandemic.
Whilst protection of the public is touted as the aim of health practitioner regulators such as the MCNZ and IAMRA, complaints against practitioners over the past four years have often, in fact, been related to disobedience to a misinformed authority. Doctors prescribing ivermectin and warning about the dangers of a novel gene editing technology named “vaccine” have been targeted en masse. Whilst there is safety in numbers, investigations against innocent and competent professionals can cause distress and illness.
Worldwide, many doctors under investigation for holding true to their medical ethics, have attempted, or successfully committed, suicide. Given the characters involved today in medical regulation, their connections with the powers who benefit from proclaimed interventions, and the march towards dictatorial health care, is public protection really the aim?
It should be noted that the Federation of State Medical Boards (FSMB), which appears to be heavily influenced by the pharmaceutical industry, and which regulates US doctors has very close ties with IAMRA. Their offices are side by side in Eulass, Texas. The various guidance statements about Covid vaccination that doctors and other health professionals worldwide were expected to adhere to are likely to have originated from these two organisations.
Make no mistake, this happy marriage is designed to make doctors become obliging purveyors of pharmaceuticals and to ensure patients have only pharmaceutical options, which may be forced upon them.
What could go wrong with this much power in the hands of a person like Tedros? Joan Simeon should have kissed a lot more frogs before choosing this one, on all our behalfs.
