One of the most disgusting aspects of the demented “transgender” fad is that it so assiduously panders to the disgusting fetishes of some of the creepiest men on the planet. Not just the groomers who use “family friendly” events to peddle Queer Theory and expose themselves to children — all under the approving eye of “progressive” parents — and lurk in women and girls’ changing areas. Not just the oily predators who pester female-owned business, and petition councils for topless swim nights for under-12s at the local pool.
No: time and again, transgenderism is weaponised to pander to and shield the violent, the predators and sex criminals.
A woman who accessed her “vast” library of child sexual abuse images from her hospital bed has been jailed.
Julie Marshall used public wifi to look at some of her 80,000 images as she recovered from a heart attack in August 2017, Preston Crown Court heard.
Note this:
Marshall, who admitted three counts of making indecent images of children, was sentenced to nine months in prison.
Making indecent images of children. How does one make indecent images of children except by, ipso facto, sexually abusing children?
And then there’s this:
They included 677 images of the most serious nature, known as category A images.
But a stash of 80,000 images doesn’t get downloaded overnight.
The 54-year-old, who had no previous convictions, admitted downloading images from the internet between June 2004 and April 2018 in February […]
Passing sentence, Judge Simon Newell said the images were “vast in number”.
He said Marshall’s “mental health issues have been of a long-standing nature”, adding: “I do not go into the detail of them, but they have run from adolescence to adult life.”
BBC
Aw, now doesn’t that make the predator sound like the victim?
And, in all of that, there’s just one glaring issue: “she” is actually a he.
John Robert Marshall/Julie Marshall, a male who identifies as a trans woman.
Why are the media lying through their teeth to protect a prolific paedophile? (One who isn’t Jimmy Savile, anyway.)
On being questioned as to why their article referred to Marshall as a woman when the offender is male, the editor of LancsLive claimed it would be a breach of IPSO’s code to refer to someone “who is legally a woman […] as a man”.
Except that not even that is true.
Despite this misinformation and obfuscation by the editor, documents from Lancashire Magistrates’ Court clearly identify Marshall as male. So LancsLive have actually breached IPSO’s code by referring to a male offender as a woman.
Trans Crime UK
The establishment will do anything to protect a predatory male paedophile, just so long as they don’t upset the Alphabet People.