The problem with politicians is that they like to mouth platitudes but very rarely do they back up those platitudes with action. Jacinda Ardern was a classic at it, uttering bumper sticker slogans, but actually doing nothing. Christopher Luxon strikes me as similar.
At Ratana, he said that he opposed co-governance ā for public services. Words matter. He should have said he opposed co-governance ā full stop. But he didn’t, he added weasel words.
Now he has done it again, this time hypothesising about race-based seats for Maori.
Fresh off using his platform at this weekās Ratana celebrations to criticise the Governmentās approach to co-governance with Maori, National Party leader Christopher Luxon is taking aim at Parliamentās Maori seats.
But despite saying their existence ādoesnāt make a lot of senseā, National will still be looking at standing candidates in āat least one or two of themā.
…
Morning Report host Guyon Espiner asked Luxon about the Maori seats, which are open to candidates of any ethnicity but since their creation in 1867 have been intended to guarantee some level of Maori representation in Parliament.
āHistorically, that has been something that weāve said ā look, one person one vote ā that doesnāt make a lot of sense in our view,ā Luxon replied.
āBut the reality is, being quite pragmatic ā¦ the Maori seats have been present in our system for some time. Theyāre not going away.ā
Eligible voters actually have two votes in New Zealand general elections ā one for a party, the other a candidate ā and being on the Maori electoral roll doesnāt actually entitle someone to more votes than a voter on the general roll.
Luxon said the National Partyās historical opposition to Maori seats in Parliament and local government is the ālogical conclusionā of believing in āone person, one vote, all equal under the lawā.
But he said the āpragmaticā move this year was to stand candidates in them anyway, and denied this was inconsistent with opposition to co-governance.
āIt is utterly consistent.ā
NewstalkZB
See what I mean? Wiffle-waffle saying something but saying nothing at all.
Maori seats are race-based. Only Maori can be on the roll for Maori electorates, and only Maori can vote in them. They were always meant to be temporary but somehow, there they still are.
Proposing seats for just Chinese, or Samoans, or dare I say Europeans would be met with scorn and derision and howls of accusations of racism. But advocate for the removal of Maori-only rolls and you’ll again be met with howls of derision and end up being called a racist, despite the obvious fact that the seats are based on race alone.
The Maori electorates essentially gift those seats to Labour, despite the appalling turnouts in elections. It is Maori-mander of the system that largely benefits one party more than any other.
If National stands candidates they always come a distant third or worse. They are the wrong sort of Maori, you see.
Why did Luxon even bother wasting his breath talking about them? It’s as pointless and useless as turning up to Ratana or Waitangi every year just to get slagged off by the actual racists in this country.
Either do something about it Christopher…or shut up and stop wasting your breath.
We all know that National will do nothing, so silence should be golden. Otherwise, we will just have to accept that the bald man speaks with a forked tongue.
Help Fund Our NewsDesk
We are building a NewsDesk, hiring journalists and taking the fight to the mainstream media. Will you help fund our NewsDesk?
Registered before? Log in to use your saved details.
If you registered an account, please enter your details below to login. If this is your first time, proceed to the donation form.
Please share this article so others can discover The BFD.