Open Letter to the Leader of the Opposition

Dear Leader of The Opposition,

I favour the use of technology and a re-emphasis on renewable energy as the best means to a sustainable future for New Zealand’s children and grandchildren. 

I deplore the conspiracies of those who are party to the UN IPCC climate fraud, together with their socialist/eugenics aspirations.  I believe that sooner or later you and your colleagues will be obliged to choose between the path I choose and that of the globalist conspiracy.

I think you now have no choice because you cannot conceal blatant fraud….for long, at any rate.

A number of the technologies and materials that I have invested in over the last 20 years have the potential to empower our objectives for renewable energies and support a vibrant economy.

Donald Trump has now received the preliminary endorsement of the Republican Party to be its leader for the 2022 Senate campaign and the 2024 Presidential elections.  The US Republicans are firmly opposed to the machinations of the globalists and socialists and sooner or later you must decide whether you and your party wish to lose the possibility of having a future mandate to govern, or whether you wish to align your perspective of climate science with reality  that causation is dominated by natural causes.  It may take a while, but the truth is ultimately a relentless force and cannot be denied when backed by empirical scientific evidence.

It is fascinating to see that with the advent of cold records being shattered this year in many places (some decades old and some since temperature recordings began), the prohibition on articles critical of the UN IPCC conspiracy are starting to enter the published media.  In some cases they tell it as I do, but in others they pay lip service to the globalist fraud and assume that someone must surely have proven that human CO2 emissions must surely cause climate change for such assertions to be made.  This is one deferential article that pays homage to the conspiracy and yet shows some facts that will eventually add up to destroy the fraud.

Elementary mathematics convinced me that with water vapour being lighter than air, and replenished by the huge reservoir of surface water, snow and ice, it is 25 times the atmospheric concentration of CO2.  By testing the molecular radiative potency for each of the radiative atmospheric gases using atomic absorption spectroscopy, water vapour is 5 times as powerful for restricting incoming solar radiation and  12 times as powerful in restricting overnight heat loss as CO2.  Water vapour has a further 28 non-radiative influences on temperature change.  CH4 and N2O are totally irrelevant.  The key facts are summarised below in the slide show by Emeritus Professor of Chemical Engineering Geoffrey G. Duffy FRSNZ. [The BFD has embedded it as a PDF]

Slide show by Emeritus Professor of Chemical Engineering Geoffrey G. Duffy FRSNZ. by Juana Atkins on Scribd

I have separately tested the atmosphere and reviewed the impact of humidity as one of three dominant factors (the other two are latitude and altitude) which determine climate on a place by place and time by time basis.  My observed proof gives anyone the opportunity to replicate my regular daily observations.  From this it is possible to observe a new absolute…that for places at the same parallel of Latitude and at the same Altitude, the ones which have the higher potential daily maximum temperature and the greater diurnal temperature range will have a lower average humidity (as expressed in grams of water per KG of air).

Throughout history there has never been a sufficient correlation between atmospheric levels of CO2 and temperature for anyone to presume that increased CO2 is a significant driver of climate change because ever today humans contribute less than 4% of emissions and the atmospheric level is only 0.04% of the atmosphere as a gas with thermal properties inferior to those of water vapour.  The assumptions made by climate modellers to promote the candidacy of CO2 as a driver of climate change are outrageous when brought into the light of day.  It can be proven that increased temperatures cause increased atmospheric levels of CO2 and certainly not the other way around.

The idea that changes in the level of atmospheric CO2 trumps a change in the level of atmospheric water vapour as a driver of climate change was so improbable from the outset that it throws into stark relief the spurious raft of sophistry used to mask the truth.  The UN IPCC fraud is far more obvious than any other fraud or Pyramid/Ponzi that I have ever seen.  As one strips off each layer of sophistry the fraudulent intent in applying that complexity to mask the truth is more and more obvious.   

This fraud was created for the sole possible purpose of providing a revenue stream from taxation of carbon emissions.  It provides and was always intended to provide the United Nations with total economic power over individual national governments.  For that reason it has become the cause celebre for the global Socialist movement in which our PM is a major force.

I feel the need to remind you that the non-aligned and emerging economies do not support the UN IPCC narrative (from both a scientific or policy perspective) and along with the leaders of Russia, China and India have a clear understanding of what the scientific facts are, as presented in this linked video from the Russian Academy of Sciences which is as accurate today as it was several years ago. (please don’t try to use its audio but print out and read the screen shots).  Lack of substantial global support for our government’s climate change plan means that all virtue-signalling by PM Ardern and Minister Shaw is just a waste of time and money.

Mathematical proof of Gross exaggeration contained in all UN IPCC models is now also available because a team of international sceptics (using mathematical analysis and the supporting evidential proof), comprising a team of 17 eminent scientists representing the world premier scientific establishments and led by the brilliant mathematician, Viscount Monckton of Brenchley, has now conclusively proven the UN IPCC computer models grossly overstate the impact of atmospheric CO₂ levels on the climate sensitivity to a possible doubling of atmospheric CO2 levels (by a factor of 3).

It follows that the fraud  cannot live for much longer.  Russian forecasts are accurate – in part because they have been aware of the mistake in all other computer models.  It has been known for several years that the UN IPCC modelling is incompatible with actual temperature forecasts.

The fact that anyone, observing the impact of the only significant “greenhouse gas“ (water vapour) can see this for themselves as the climate changes from time to time and place to place, means this was always a fraud, not a mistake.  Climate fraud never ever passed the “smell test” for sensible people and yet the fraud is still stoutly defended by those who will lose their tenure as “experts” once their involvement in the promotion of the fraud is published.  I attach herewith for you my two short summaries (“CLIMATE EMERGENCY”  and “THE EARTH’S Climate”) that show how the advice you have been getting has been so massively and obviously perverted.

Climate Emergency (3) by Juana Atkins on Scribd

The Earth’s Climate by Juana Atkins on Scribd

Many Whistleblowers (1) by Juana Atkins on Scribd

My annoyance at the climate fraud is based on the fact that I probably benefit from it, and I want that to stop.  That is why I retired as a JP after 23 years to bring about its demise by any means possible.  I don’t want the thousands of whistle-blowers to have lost their jobs, careers or died in vain, (see my final attachment above) just because I have profited.  For me it would seem a sad end to a righteous career in defence of good business practice and fair play.

Yours sincerely

John Rofe

PS. One additional definition of ignorance could be when we accept the saying that, “there is no smoke without fire”, while ignoring the obvious corollary that, “there are no clouds without water vapour”.  Unseen and unseeable, yet weighing between 15-20 trillion tonnes, water vapour is the mechanism for ensuring that earth’s climate is habitable.  Strange how a supranational body could lie about that isn’t it?

Please share this BFD article so others can discover The BFD.