Nicole McKee
Spokesperson
Fair and Reasonable Campaign

Parliament was back last week, and despite the Government originally having the Arms Legislation Bill at the top of the Parliamentary Order Paper (that is the official agenda of Parliament) it kept being pushed back and delayed. This Stuff headline may sum it up:

On Friday Radio NZ has reported the government ā€œremains dividedā€ and this weekā€™s delay means that ā€œany hope Labour had of passing legislation in time for the March 15 one year anniversary is now lostā€. 

What does this mean?

With the Anniversary to be missed, we say it is even more logical to now wait until the Royal Commission of Inquiry into Christchurch reports back at the end of April, before making any decisions on the Bill.  That is certainly our message to MPs.

Police Association pulling out all stops

It appears that our opponents are starting to get worried. This week they were touring the studios calling for an end of the ā€œpolitical point-scoringā€ and for MPs to ā€œdo the right thingā€.  Thatā€™s code for not liking our campaign, or our friends in Parliament pointing out the risks of a firearms register. For them, the ā€œright thingā€ is what they say is right, not what law-abiding firearms owners like you and me think.

I joined TVNZā€™s Breakfast to debate the Police association president. Click here to watch on-demand.

The Police Association president Chris Cahill was also very upset that someone used our online email tool to contact NZ First MPs and entered his name. Whoever did that wasnā€™t very clever ā€“ they put in Mr Cahillā€™s email so he received our confirmation email.

While we do not condone this sort of behaviour, we think that in the context of thousands of licenced firearms owners voicing their concerns, itā€™s a bit weak to try and argue that those people should be ignored because one person was mischievous.

We also note the irony of going to the media about this while at the same time calling on MPs not to ā€˜point scoreā€™. Whoever it was, it had to be someone who knows Chris Cahillā€™s email address, so maybe he has an idea who was behind it? We certainly donā€™t.

Police misinform Parliament on harsh gun club laws

On a much more serious note, we have uncovered that Police cited evidence that does not actually exist in persuading Parliament to adopt harsher restrictions on gun clubs and ranges.

The Policeā€™s recommendation for licensing clubs and ranges was apparently because there were local concerns on safety and noise. It turns out thatā€™s a real stretch. When our lawyers asked for the evidence under the Official Information Act, the Police could only reference ā€œanecdotal information of complaints (sic)ā€ and that ā€œPolice is (sic) often approached by Local Authorities with concerns over this type of land use.ā€

So our lawyers then went directly to the local authorities (i.e. New Zealandā€™s councils) asking them to specify the number and type of complaints against rifle clubs and ranges, and when these had been notified to Police.

94% of the councils responded and could find no instances of them reporting a range or club safety issue to Police.

In fact, of the 75 councils who responded, there were only three noise complaints they had received about firearms use.

You can read more in our media release on the issue here.

Police raid family looking for firearms that had already been handed in

ACT’s David Seymour has released another instance of Police raiding a family home searching for prohibited firearms that didnā€™t exist. In this case, though, Police’s own records show that they were handed in!

Click here for ACT’s media release with the full details.

Clubs and ranges are threatened by the Arms Legislation Bill

In addition to last week’s newspaper and online advertising campaign, we went down on the range with John Herbert of NZ Rod & Rifle Magazine to hear his take on why clubs and ranges are so important for our community.

Guest Post content does not necessarily reflect the views of the site or its editor. Guest Post content is offered for discussion and for alternative points of view.