The American left are currently cock-a-hoop that lynching has finally been made a Federal crime, linking the passage of the bill directly to the murder of Emmett Till. Which begs the question: why pass a statute for a crime that hasnāt been reported for nigh on forty years, or link it to a case from 65 years ago? Why indeed? Is there even a need to outlaw what is already clearly outlawed (kidnapping, torture, murder)?
The answer is two simple words: race-baiting.
Racism is not dead, but it is on life support — kept alive by politicians, race hustlers and people who get a sense of superiority by denouncing others as ‘racists’
Thomas Sowell
Put simply, the left is obsessed with race and with keeping alive at all costs the notion that racism is a bubbling stew of hate that indelibly stains not just the United States but everything that is white and masculine.
This is, not to put too fine a point on it, utter garbage. Global surveys show that Western nations are the least racist in the world. Data from dating site OKCupid suggests that women are more racist than men. These surveys have their limitations of course: after all, sexual preference for one race need not involve actively disliking others. But the pattern is clear: racism is not a white, male problem, especially in the United States.
So, why are the left so obsessed with racism in defiance of all the facts?
Firstly, because race and racism is the modern leftās founding myth.
The left-wing that we see today was founded in the early 1960s and its raison dāetre was civil rights. Not Vietnam, not communism, not free love. As Bryan Burroughsā Days of Rage clearly documents, the be-all and end-all of the āMovementā was civil rights. āThis was never about the war,ā states Weather Underground leader Howie Machtinger. āRace comes first, always first,ā agrees radical attorney Elizabeth Fink.
It is no surprise and certainly no discredit that civil rights was the foundational motivation of the modern left. In the mid-1950s the children of the post-War Baby Boom experienced a painful awakening. Raised on the notion of Americaās unique goodness, Brown v. Board of Education, the Montgomery bus boycotts and, yes, the murder of Emmett Till, made them suddenly, shockingly aware that a rottenness of which they had been all but completely ignorant festered in Americaās heart.
Civil rights was a noble struggle ā and it was won. With surprising swiftness. Within a decade, Jim Crow was gone and civil rights were law. The Klan, already dwindled to barely 0.1% of its former membership, rapidly ceased to be a significant force. Institutional racism in the US was dead and social racism was making its last gasp. Archie Bunker was an anachronistic joke figure rather than conventional wisdom.
Therein lay the problem for the left. A problem solved is an existential crisis for an activist. By the 1970s, the left faced the choice of either conceding that it had won or digging in and fighting on, even if the enemy had ceased to exist. Like Japanese holdouts who fought on in the Pacific long after the end of WWII, the left simply refused to believe that the war against racism in the United States was over. For some, it was a matter of clinging to a crumbling world-view.
Then, in the late 1980s, the left hit on new strategies that would keep their golden goose alive for as long as they could ever want. Intersectionality and neo-Marxism declared that all politics and society were nothing but power-struggles between identity groups, race above all.
The left had discovered the lifeline that never runs out and theyāve been playing it to the hilt ever since.
More importantly, āanti-racismā is the leftās fundamental moral litmus test. If racism is bad, then it illogically follows, by the pretzel-logic of the left, that all bad people are racist. In their Manichean world-view, the left, as Jim Goad says, āare drunk on the notion of their moral irreproachabilityā. If the left is anti-racist and good, therefore, then the right must be racist and bad.
Besides, as even the dimmest bulbs of the left have figured out, as they survey the smoking ruins of the Soviet Union, Romania, Cuba and Venezuela, theyāve lost every other political and economic argument. They need to cling desperately to the moral high ground somehow.
So, if youāve ever wondered why, as soon as you try to debate a leftist they start screaming āracist!ā at you, wonder no more.
Youāre just a bad person and theyāre not.
If you enjoyed this BFD article please consider sharing it with your friends.