Of all the things I never wanted to know about, Harvey Weinstein’s magina would certainly have been high on the list. Unfortunately, just as with “Two Girls, One Cup” and “Blue Waffle”, my child-like innocence could not long survive in the blast-furnace of unwanted information that is the internet. (Do not Google either of those: Trust Me.)
A onetime aspiring actress told a Manhattan jury on Friday that Harvey Weinstein […]has no testicles and appeared to have a vagina.
Mann said she thought Weinstein was “intersex” the first time she saw him naked.
“The first time I saw him fully naked,” she said, “I thought he was deformed and intersex. He has an extreme scarring that I didn’t know, maybe [he] was a burn victim […]”
“He does not have testicles, and it appears that he has a vagina,” Mann said.
Weinstein reportedly slumped his head in the courtroom when Mann described his purportedly deformed genitals.
“He also peed on me once,” she said.
Well, there you go, BFD readers, 106 words that you almost certainly didn’t want to see. But I had to, so I don’t see why I should suffer alone. A scarred innocence shared is a scarred innocence halved. Now we can all go and have a collective cup of tea and good lie-down.
But, mangina nightmares aside, this is some serious business, as one of the most corrosive left-wing obsessions to scarify modern society, the “#MeToo movement”, has to make its case in a court of law, rather than the court of social media, for the first time.
The trial is widely seen as a milestone in the #MeToo movement, in which women have accused powerful men in business, entertainment, media and politics of sexual misconduct.
In which respect, it might not be helping to demolish the nagging notion that “MeToo” is just old-fashioned casting-couch quid pro quo. After all, it seems rather odd to enter into a relationship with someone you claim had already repeatedly sexually abused you.
Mann said she then entered into a relationship with Weinstein.
“I entered into what I thought was going to be a real relationship with him and it was extremely degrading from that point on.”
pluralist.com/jessica-mann-harvey-weinstein-testicles/
As opposed to the high dignity of being peed on by mangina-man.
Certainly, the lawyers are raising their thousand-dollar-an-hour eyebrows.
Jessica Mann, 34, was pressed to explain why she met Weinstein the day after the alleged attack and whether she was manipulating the once-powerful movie mogul, whose rape trial in New York entered its third week of testimony…
[Weinstein’s lawyer, Donna] Rotunno asked whether Mann “manipulated” Weinstein when she sent him friendly messages and asked to see him, even though she was not attracted to him.
“How I handled it to survive and process it, yeah, I guess you could say manipulation,” Mann answered […] Rotunno went on to show Mann an email she sent Weinstein several months later in which she gave him her new contact information and said she would be “happy to see your smile.”
pluralist.com/jessica-man-harvey-weinstein-trial/
A lot happier than seeing other parts of him, no doubt.
Meanwhile, let us all fervently pray that the court doesn’t demand photographic evidence.
If you enjoyed this BFD article please consider sharing it with your friends.