The mother country is well on its way down the gurgler as is demonstrated by the huge increase in knife and gun crime.

After watching this video (warning: bad language) berating Sadiq Khan for his disinterest in knife crime because he’s too busy mouthing off against Donald Trump, I assumed London had the worst affliction of violence and is the yardstick showing how close the total collapse of the country is.

But I was wrong because violence is much worse in the Midlands.

Across the West Midlands, violent crime has become unnervingly common. Despite knife crime in the capital making the headlines, it has risen by 103% since 2014 in this region compared with 48% in London, with 14 knife crimes a day so far this year often targeting children of school age.

Meanwhile, gun crime is up by a third in the West Midlands, and murder, GBH and other violent crimes increased by 17% in the last year alone. In London, the rises were about 10% and 6% year-on-year, respectively.”

The Guardian

So, what happens if Britain’s Labour Party grabs the helm after elections this December and the leader of anarchy himself, Jeremy Corbyn, stamps even more violence and dissent on the recumbent nation?

“Jeremy Corbyn, as nasty a piece of work as ever a democracy has ever produced, waits for the keys to Number Ten to fall in his lap.”

The BFD

Incumbent prime minister Boris Johnson hasn’t quite thrown in the towel just yet but admits “It’s going to be a tough election but we will do the best we can”.

As well he should, because the law and order the Brits used to know is fast disappearing. Soon it will be overtaken by ruthless sharia law seekers. You may be surprised to learn that you are already paying sharia taxes here in New Zealand if you buy halal certified products.

But back to the subject at hand and the rampant migration that heralded the end of a peaceful and orderly life for many Brits.

On rampant migration, Angela Merkel said in 2017 of her controversial decision to admit over a million refugees in 2015, that she had “no regrets” and she would make the big decisions “the same way again”. But two years later, Merkel was forced to admit that her massive experiment in multiculturalism had failed to integrate the refugees into the German culture and way of life.

“Merkel didn’t say that immigrants are bad or that Germany shouldn’t accept refugees; she said the current experience in Germany of “allowing people of different cultural backgrounds to live side by side without integrating had not worked”.

Boston Herald

Merkel does not say how you can force people to integrate and it is highly unlikely that it could have been done, given the huge numbers Germany admitted since 2015. Possibly by controlling numbers? But even then, a culture that despises its host country’s culture is never going to integrate. Merkel’s quest to boost Germany’s economy with open-door mass migration had some financial benefits, but was the horrendous social cost worth it?

Britain has the same two-fold problem regarding migration. First, there are the migrants who refuse to integrate and second, the high birth rate of many migrant cultures will eventually overtake the population of the host country.

“The Muslim population of the UK is set to triple in 30 years, according to projections from the Pew Research Centre. 

Under the model which assumes median migration levels, the number of Muslims in the country would rise from 4.1m in 2016 to 13m in 2050.”

Telegraph

Muslim women are having an average of 2.9 children compared to 1.8 had by non-Muslims. On this basis how many generations or years, do you think it will be until sharia law is introduced in Britain? Without policies to intervene, that is.

From this, we learn that controlled immigration is essential to secure a western future for our children’s children. Events in Britain show that democracy will be our own worst enemy unless we put strategies in place to control migration.  And no, this is not racist; this is good old common sense.