Whenever real women have the temerity to ark up about hulking beefcakes in dresses crash-tackling their way into women’s events, organisations and spaces, they’re fobbed off with mealy-mouthed rubbish about “inclusion”. But, as women are discovering to their chagrin, “inclusion” is just the “progressive” way of telling women to shut up and know their place.
It’s a man’s world on the rainbow left – especially for men who squeeze their fake boobs into a sports bra and run out on to the field and proceed to smash the girls into the mud.
Biological males who identify as transgender women are wreaking havoc in women’s rugby in Great Britain.
Women’s rugby referees in England are quitting their jobs over the inclusion of the male athletes, according to a report in The Sunday Times this weekend.
“Being forced to prioritize hurt feelings over broken bones exposes me to personal litigation from female players who have been damaged by players who are biologically male. This is driving female players and referees out of the game,” one referee told the British paper under the condition of anonymity.
The fact that these referees have to talk under cover of anonymity speaks to the vicious intolerance of the tranny lobby. Anyone who dares speak out is vilified and pursued with every weapon of the modern authoritarian, from social media bullying to the hurty-feelings police.
You’re not even allowed to question whether that towering neanderthal with the flowing beard and the protective box might actually be, you know, a man.
“If you even ask the question, you are told you are a bigot,” another referee told the Times, stating that they had witnessed five different women’s players with beards over the course of half a season.
Typically, the rules work entirely one way – and not in the girls’ favour.
Former Olympic athlete Sharron Davies told the paper that allowing biologically male athletes who identify as transgender women to play on female rugby teams is non-sensical.
“My daughter Grace was told at the age of 11 she could no longer play with the boys because it was no longer safe. How can they have that rule in place and […] say it is perfectly OK for a transgender woman who is a biological man to play with the girls, but girls who are girls are not allowed to play with the boys because it is dangerous?” said Davies.
pluralist.com/transgender-athletes-wreak-havoc-in-womens-rugby
Of course, it’s dangerous. Deny plain biological reality though they might, the fact remains that men have overwhelming physical advantages over women when it comes to contests of strength and endurance. Even the strongest, fittest woman is going to lose out to a mediocre man. For instance, the women’s soccer world champions were beaten by a team of 15-year-old boys. High school boys regularly smash women’s Olympic records.
But it’s in rough sports like boxing and rugby that women are really getting smashed. Literally. This is not just grossly unfair, it’s downright dangerous.
Just don’t dare say so, you “transphobes” and “TERFs”. You might hurt some tranny’s feelings. In the brave new world of “progressive” gender politics, only women are allowed to get hurt. Suck it up, girls: it’s “inclusive”.