There are some things that just go without saying: don’t stick forks in electrical sockets, don’t jump off a cliff even if your friends do it and, whatever you do, do not let convicted paedophiles anywhere near children. But this is 2019, and nothing goes without saying any more.
After an event last year in which drag queens read pro-LGBT stories to children at Wichita’s Advanced Learning Library, the community’s library board is currently debating a proposal to automatically disqualify convicted sex offenders from presenting at libraries in the area.
How is this even up for debate? Anyone who even says, “Hey, do you think it might be a bad idea to let a paedo sit kids on his knee and read to them about gay sex and cross-dressing?” should be automatically disqualified from handling sharp objects, let alone being in a position of responsibility.
I’d file this under the “duh” category. People who like to do it with kids shouldn’t be around kids. If you have a problem around a thing, you shouldn’t be around that thing. Kind of like how alcoholics don’t walk into bars. Except for an alcoholic in a bar just might drink what’s there. He’s not going to shove his penis into a bottle of Jack Daniels and tell it to shut up and take it, don’t tell mom and dad. So even that analogy doesn’t pan out.
Now, in case anyone is insane enough to see this as some kind of atavistic homophobic agenda, I present to you exhibits A, B, and so on.
Maddeningly enough, this measure is being met with resistance. Pay attention, because the opposition here makes up some of the same people who call you a nazi for voting a certain way.
“It’s clear why they’re checking for sex offenses only: they’re trying to label the LGBT population in this city as sex offenders, which is offensive in and of itself,” Equality Kansas director Thomas Witt claimed, the Wichita Eagle reported.
It should come as a surprise to absolutely no-one that predators are exploiting any opportunity they’re given. In the same way that patriotism is the last resort of a scoundrel, exposing little children to explicitly sexualised propaganda is being exploited by predators in wigs and dresses. Remember, Samuel Johnson, who first made the observation about patriotism, actually loved patriotism. His comment was not a condemnation of patriotism itself, only a recognition that lying scoundrels are always ready to exploit it.
Not wanting paedophiles anywhere near children is not homophobic.
Checking for sex-offenses only is relevant when presenting children to adults (mostly men) who may have a problem controlling their man hands and wangs around children. I’d like to know if the adult male in a dress has a glove compartment full of kiddy porn, not parking tickets. It doesn’t matter so much to me if the tranny has done time for traffic violations, insurance fraud, tax evasion or insider trading. While those things are bad, passing on a double yellow isn’t as grave as passing a kindergartener some Jesus Juice for a good time.
Second thing, no one is labeling the entire LGBT community as sex offenders. Except maybe Thomas Witt who drew that conclusion all on his own. To equate wanting to ban sex offenders from reading to children with the LGBT community at large kind of seems like Thomas Witt assumes the entire LGBT community at large is a bunch of sex offenders. Which is offensive, in and of itself.
louderwithcrowder.com/kansas-library-board-divided-over-banning-pedophiles-from-reading-to-kids/
It’s ridiculous, of course, to suggest that paedo-trannies are going to be raping kiddies at the public library. But, just as criminals “case” their targets, so do paedophiles. Granting paedophiles access to potential targets, as well as exposing children to highly sexualised imagery and content, is a recipe for disaster.
And just another way of advancing the Queer Theory agenda of the far left.
Extreme leftists only care about using children for their own gains and pleasures […] But this is the extreme left. No, not the left. I have to believe many a liberal would have a real problem with a sex offender reading to their child. I also have to believe many a liberal wouldn’t want their child to engage in “consensual” sex with an adult. Yet that’s where the extreme left is taking us next.